<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Automatic Feed Photo Scanners</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.homevideo101.com/automatic-feed-photo-scanners/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.homevideo101.com/automatic-feed-photo-scanners/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 19:56:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>http://www.homevideo101.com/automatic-feed-photo-scanners/comment-page-1/#comment-778</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 21:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homevideo101.com/automatic-feed-photo-scanners/#comment-778</guid>
		<description>I have one of these scanners. Honestly, I hate the photo feeder because it damages the pictures. It leaves a very faint mark (crease) on each photo where it is fed into the scanner. Don&#039;t waste your money. Do it the old fashioned way. That&#039;s probably why they stopped makeing these.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have one of these scanners. Honestly, I hate the photo feeder because it damages the pictures. It leaves a very faint mark (crease) on each photo where it is fed into the scanner. Don&#8217;t waste your money. Do it the old fashioned way. That&#8217;s probably why they stopped makeing these.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.homevideo101.com/automatic-feed-photo-scanners/comment-page-1/#comment-774</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 04:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homevideo101.com/automatic-feed-photo-scanners/#comment-774</guid>
		<description>I have been searching for over a week now trying to find just such a automatic photo scanner. It seems like no company makes such a scanner anymore, or they want you to drop 500-3000 bucks for a professional one.

Everyone seems to think you have to do it manually, on by one, with a flatbed scanner. I couldn&#039;t believe people would be willing to spend months doing such a tedious task, when it could all be automated. I found countless forum threads of people who have done that, but you are the first to actually do it the smart way. : )

I can&#039;t find this on ebay or any other site, so wish me luck as I keep looking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been searching for over a week now trying to find just such a automatic photo scanner. It seems like no company makes such a scanner anymore, or they want you to drop 500-3000 bucks for a professional one.</p>
<p>Everyone seems to think you have to do it manually, on by one, with a flatbed scanner. I couldn&#8217;t believe people would be willing to spend months doing such a tedious task, when it could all be automated. I found countless forum threads of people who have done that, but you are the first to actually do it the smart way. : )</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t find this on ebay or any other site, so wish me luck as I keep looking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
