<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Automatic Feed Photo Scanners</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.homevideo101.com/automatic-feed-photo-scanners/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.homevideo101.com/automatic-feed-photo-scanners/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 19:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>http://www.homevideo101.com/automatic-feed-photo-scanners/#comment-778</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 21:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homevideo101.com/automatic-feed-photo-scanners/#comment-778</guid>
		<description>I have one of these scanners. Honestly, I hate the photo feeder because it damages the pictures. It leaves a very faint mark (crease) on each photo where it is fed into the scanner. Don't waste your money. Do it the old fashioned way. That's probably why they stopped makeing these.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have one of these scanners. Honestly, I hate the photo feeder because it damages the pictures. It leaves a very faint mark (crease) on each photo where it is fed into the scanner. Don&#8217;t waste your money. Do it the old fashioned way. That&#8217;s probably why they stopped makeing these.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.homevideo101.com/automatic-feed-photo-scanners/#comment-774</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 04:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homevideo101.com/automatic-feed-photo-scanners/#comment-774</guid>
		<description>I have been searching for over a week now trying to find just such a automatic photo scanner. It seems like no company makes such a scanner anymore, or they want you to drop 500-3000 bucks for a professional one.

Everyone seems to think you have to do it manually, on by one, with a flatbed scanner. I couldn't believe people would be willing to spend months doing such a tedious task, when it could all be automated. I found countless forum threads of people who have done that, but you are the first to actually do it the smart way. : )

I can't find this on ebay or any other site, so wish me luck as I keep looking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been searching for over a week now trying to find just such a automatic photo scanner. It seems like no company makes such a scanner anymore, or they want you to drop 500-3000 bucks for a professional one.</p>
<p>Everyone seems to think you have to do it manually, on by one, with a flatbed scanner. I couldn&#8217;t believe people would be willing to spend months doing such a tedious task, when it could all be automated. I found countless forum threads of people who have done that, but you are the first to actually do it the smart way. : )</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t find this on ebay or any other site, so wish me luck as I keep looking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
